“Defendants acknowledged at oral argument that the record does not tell us whether the alleged hand-soaking occurred before or after the sutures were removed. But if Butts-Franklin had soaked her hand after the sutures were removed, it ‘c[ould not] be the basis for a mitigation of damages instruction’ because she ‘did not act contrary to the advice given,'” Justice Stuart A. Raphael wrote on behalf of the unanimous appellate panel.

Click Here To Read The Full Article