State High Court Reinstates Lawsuit, Ruling 'Innocent Decision Maker' Can Further Discriminatory Corporate Policy
“The Cat’s Paw theory adopted by the SJC recognizes that an employer is responsible when a biased actor influences a final decision at any point in the decisionmaker process, and that the bias can come from either the highest levels or from below,” one of the attorneys representing Adams, Ilir Kavaja of Kavaja Law, told Law.com about the SJC’s ruling.
CEO of Speaker Media and Marketing, is the "Secret Weapon of Personal Injury Lawyers and Trial Attorneys" throughout the United States. Specializing as a marketing consultant to lawyers, with a primary focus on content marketing, social media, online video and mobile marketing strategies.
Click Here To Read The Full Article